<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Changelog &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zeppox.net/weblog/category/politics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog</link>
	<description>Doing the things a web geek does</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:08:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Its a matter of national security!</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/its-a-matter-of-national-security</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/its-a-matter-of-national-security#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rabbit/~jackson/wordpress/its-a-matter-of-national-security</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tom Tomorrow&#8217;s comments on the Eli Lilly provisions in the Homeland Security bill do a pretty good job of summing up the situation.</p>

<p>Bottom line; doesn&#8217;t this seem just a little sleazy?</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Tomorrow&#8217;s <a href="http://www.thismodernworld.com/weblog/mtarchives/week_2002_11_24.html#000021">comments</a> on the Eli Lilly provisions in the Homeland Security bill do a pretty good job of summing up the situation.</p>

<p>Bottom line; doesn&#8217;t this seem just a <em>little</em> sleazy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/its-a-matter-of-national-security/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A rational argument against war</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/a-rational-argument-against-war</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/a-rational-argument-against-war#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rabbit/~jackson/wordpress/a-rational-argument-against-war</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Doug Bandow at the Cato Institute presents a very rational and reasonable article on why Bush&#8217;s agresiveness towards Iraq should be opposed. [via  Tom Tomorrow and Joe Conason]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug Bandow at the <a href="http://www.cato.org/">Cato Institute</a> presents a very rational and reasonable <a href="http://www.cato.org/dailys/11-18-02.html" title="Making Enemies or Protecting Americans, Doug Bandow">article</a> on why Bush&#8217;s agresiveness towards Iraq should be opposed. [via <a href="http://www.thismodernworld.com/weblog/mtarchives/week_2002_11_17.html#000009"> Tom Tomorrow</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/conason/2002/11/20/conservatives/index.html?x">Joe Conason</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/a-rational-argument-against-war/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashcroft 1, Civil Liberties 0</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/ashcroft-1-civil-liberties-0</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/ashcroft-1-civil-liberties-0#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rabbit/~jackson/wordpress/ashcroft-1-civil-liberties-0</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It looks like an appeals court has overturned the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court&#8217;s opinion theat the Patriot Act violated the 4th amendment.  Well, this wouldn&#8217;t be terrible, except that since only the government presented arguments, there isn&#8217;t anyone to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. 
[via Anil]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like an appeals court <a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;storyID=1762254" title="Reuters | Latest Financial News / Full News Coverage">has overturned</a> the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court&#8217;s opinion theat the Patriot Act violated the 4th amendment.  Well, this wouldn&#8217;t be <em>terrible</em>, except that since only the government presented arguments, there isn&#8217;t anyone to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. 
[via <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/index.php?archives/004092.php">Anil</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/ashcroft-1-civil-liberties-0/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Well don&#8217;t that just suck?</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/well-dont-that-just-suck</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/well-dont-that-just-suck#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2002 16:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rabbit/~jackson/wordpress/well-dont-that-just-suck</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Reublicans managed to squeek past the Democrats again.  I&#8217;m afraid the next two years are going to be very painful to watch.  Hopefully the Republicans won&#8217;t become the rubber-stamp brigade, but I&#8217;m not getting my hopes up.  I just hope they don&#8217;t start going on about &#8220;revolutions&#8221; and &#8220;mandates&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2002/">Looks like</a> the Reublicans managed to squeek past the Democrats again.  I&#8217;m afraid the next two years are going to be very painful to watch.  <em>Hopefully</em> the Republicans won&#8217;t become the rubber-stamp brigade, but I&#8217;m not getting my hopes up.  I just hope they don&#8217;t start going on about &#8220;revolutions&#8221; and &#8220;mandates&#8221; and other crap.  Look at the numbers.  This country is split right down the middle.  Most races look like they&#8217;ll be decided by a rather small majority.  </p>

<p>Next question: What the hell can the Left do to get some respect in this country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/11/well-dont-that-just-suck/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Its for the good of the country!</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/10/its-for-the-good-of-the-country</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/10/its-for-the-good-of-the-country#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rabbit/~jackson/wordpress/its-for-the-good-of-the-country</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Did you help buy Bush a PlayStation 2?  Congratulations to those who contributed to this most noble cause. </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you help <a href="http://www.evilninja.net/buybush.htm" title="Buy Bush a PlayStation 2">buy Bush a PlayStation 2</a>?  Congratulations to those who contributed to this most noble cause. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/10/its-for-the-good-of-the-country/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So why aren&#8217;t we fighting them?</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/10/so-why-arent-we-fighting-them</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/10/so-why-arent-we-fighting-them#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rabbit/~jackson/wordpress/so-why-arent-we-fighting-them</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mean Mr. Mustard says that the Chechen guerillas are the enemy.  He&#8217;s right.  We (the world) is at war with those who would use terror to further their aims.  That these people think such actions will help them in any way is mind boggling.  However, I think Instapundit says that anti-warbloggers [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.meanmrmustard.net/archives/000351.html#000351" title="Mean Mr. Mustard: Another glimpse at who we're fighting">Mean Mr. Mustard</a> says that the Chechen guerillas are the enemy.  He&#8217;s right.  We (the world) is at war with those who would use terror to further their aims.  That these people think such actions will help them in any way is mind boggling.  However, I think <a href="http://www.instapundit.com/archives/005005.php#005005">Instapundit</a> says that anti-warbloggers won&#8217;t like what Mr. Mustard has to say.  I can&#8217;t see why, Mr. Mustard had a point.  Of course, my question for everyone is: Why is President Bush waisting our time in Iraq when there are truly <em>useful</em> things he could be doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2002/10/so-why-arent-we-fighting-them/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
