<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Changelog &#187; TGOP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zeppox.net/weblog/category/movies/the-great-oscar-project/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog</link>
	<description>Doing the things a web geek does</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:08:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Godfather (1972)</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/07/the-godfather-1972</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/07/the-godfather-1972#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeppox.net/weblog/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s odd that we&#8217;ve made it to the seventies before having trouble getting ahold of the DVDs we&#8217;re supposed to watch, but Netflix seems to have some gaps in its collection of Oscar winners from the era.</p>

<p>I first watched The Godfather trilogy my freshman year in college, as I was avoiding anything resembling studying for [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=changelog-20%26link_code=xm2%26camp=2025%26creative=165953%26path=http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%253fASIN=B0001NBNB6%2526tag=changelog-20%2526lcode=xm2%2526cID=2025%2526ccmID=165953%2526location=/o/ASIN/B0001NBNB6%25253FSubscriptionId=0EMV44A9A5YT1RVDGZ82" title="View product details at Amazon"><img class="alignleft" src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0001NBNB6.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg" alt="The Godfather" /></a></p>

<p>It&#8217;s odd that we&#8217;ve made it to the seventies before having trouble getting ahold of the DVDs we&#8217;re supposed to watch, but Netflix seems to have some gaps in its collection of Oscar winners from the era.</p>

<p>I first watched The Godfather trilogy my freshman year in college, as I was avoiding anything resembling studying for finals. I was impressed by parts I and II, but I found part II to be quite lousy. I think I like part II the best, as part I moves a little slowly at times. That said, it&#8217;s still a wonderful movie.</p>

<p>What did I like about the movie? The music, Al Pacino, Robert Duvall, Marlon Brando, the epic scope (man am I a sucker for an epic), and the dialogue. What don&#8217;t I like? Diane Keaton. I also found it really hard to keep all the characters straight, particularly the Corleone family liutenants.</p>

<p><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0068646/">The Godfather @ IMDb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/07/the-godfather-1972/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The French Connection (1971)</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/07/the-french-connection-1971</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/07/the-french-connection-1971#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeppox.net/weblog/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What struck me the most about this movie? That it was odd to see Roy Scheider and Gene Hackman looking so young &#8212;  almost distractingly so. </p>

<p>I&#8217;m having trouble thinking of anything to write, it&#8217;s been a few weeks since we watched this movie. Nothing much about it has really stuck out in my [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=changelog-20%26link_code=xm2%26camp=2025%26creative=165953%26path=http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%253fASIN=B00003CXA3%2526tag=changelog-20%2526lcode=xm2%2526cID=2025%2526ccmID=165953%2526location=/o/ASIN/B00003CXA3%25253FSubscriptionId=0EMV44A9A5YT1RVDGZ82" title="View product details at Amazon"><img class="alignleft" src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00003CXA3.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg" alt="The French Connection (Five Star Collection)" /></a></p>

<p>What struck me the most about this movie? That it was odd to see Roy Scheider and Gene Hackman looking so young &mdash;  almost distractingly so. </p>

<p>I&#8217;m having trouble thinking of anything to write, it&#8217;s been a few weeks since we watched this movie. Nothing much about it has really stuck out in my mind, except that it feels really dated compared to modern police dramas and that this is another movie that just screams out that it was made in the seventies. It was decent, but clearly didn&#8217;t make much of a lasting impression.</p>

<p><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0067116/">The French Connection @ IMDb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/07/the-french-connection-1971/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patton (1970)</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/patton</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/patton#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/patton-1970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I knew about George Patton before watching this movie was that he was somehow related to tanks and the Battle of the Bulge. Having admitted that I know very little about the man, I felt like Patton strove to show both the positive (his tactical knowledge) and the negative (his abrasiveness) in [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=changelog-20%26link_code=xm2%26camp=2025%26creative=165953%26path=http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%253fASIN=B00005PJ8O%2526location=/o/ASIN/B00005PJ8O%25253FSubscriptionId=0EMV44A9A5YT1RVDGZ82" title="View product details at Amazon"><img class="alignleft" src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00005PJ8O.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg" alt="Patton" /></a></p>

<p>The only thing I knew about George Patton before watching this movie was that he was somehow related to tanks and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_bulge">Battle of the Bulge</a>. Having admitted that I know very little about the man, I felt like <em>Patton</em> strove to show both the positive (his tactical knowledge) and the negative (his abrasiveness) in Patton. One of the themes that runs through the movie felt particularly true &mdash; Patton was a man out of time, who was designed for battle in a time when being a military leader had as much to do with politics as war. </p>

<p>The movie moves quickly through World War II (it has to in order to follow Patton through the entire war), which can leave the viewer behind at times. We will see the aftermath of a battle without its beginning, or the start of a campaign but not its end. This makes the movie feel very discontinuous, fragmented. In spite of this, I enjoyed the movie as a learning experience both about the war and about Patton. I greatly enjoyed watching George C Scott as Patton, and Karl Malden as Omar Bradley but I learned after the fact that Scott was a somewhat disingenuous choice for Patton. The real Patton had a rather high-pitched voice, and was a poor public speaker. Since much of the movie relies on Scott&#8217;s presence and gravelly voice to give life to Patton, I feel like we get a somewhat idealized vision of the man.</p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Patton">Patton @ Wikipedia</a>
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066206/">Patton @ IMDb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/patton/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midnight Cowboy (1969)</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/midnight-cowboy</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/midnight-cowboy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/midnight-cowboy-1969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are movies you appreciate for the way they are made or acted, yet would never want to see again. I&#8217;m going to add Midnight Cowboy to my list of such movies. The performances are fantastic. I usually loathe Jon Voight but he&#8217;s fantastic as Joe Buck. I find it a little hard to believe [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are movies you appreciate for the way they are made or acted, yet would never want to see again. I&#8217;m going to add Midnight Cowboy to my list of such movies. The performances are fantastic. I usually loathe Jon Voight but he&#8217;s fantastic as Joe Buck. I find it a little hard to believe he can keep his innocence and happy-go-lucky attitude as long as he does, but Voight pulls it off. Dustin Hoffman acts with something other than a bemused smile on his face, and does it well (and who have thought Hoffman could be so sleazy?). </p>

<p>The feel of the movie is vintage 1970s &#8212; gritty, real, with lots of pop songs and shots of people walking around the big city at night. Throw in some neat camera tricks at a drugged-out party and you&#8217;ve hit most of the popular visuals of the era. These tricks get a little old after a while, though they avoid to irritating repetition that was most of <a href="http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/tom-jones">Tom Jones</a>. </p>

<p>I did have two big problems with the movie, primarily the odd flashbacks which seem to be hinting at some nasty past for Joe Buck. The problem is that the Joe Buck we see in no way bares the scars one would expect to find if he and his girlfriend were both gang raped. My other big problem was the scene where Joe (apparently) kills a man from Chicago who has invited Joe up to his hotel room (for sex presumably). I can understand the robbery, but Joe proceeds to attack the man with a telephone in a manner completely inconsistent with everything we&#8217;ve learned about him.</p>

<p>In the end the tale of Joe and Ratso is a pretty depressing one, though mostly well told, but I&#8217;m not a big enough fan of 1970s film making to want to sit through the whole thing again. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064665/">Midnight Cowboy @ IMDb</a></p>

<p><a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19690705/REVIEWS/40819002/1023">Roger Ebert&#8217;s Review from 1969</a>, which seems to say most of what I just said with much better writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/midnight-cowboy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oliver! (1968)</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/oliver</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/oliver#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/oliver-1968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We accidentally started this movie at the half-way point (I hate DVDs that are poorly labeled) and didn&#8217;t even notice till it ended rather suddenly. Starting over from the start didn&#8217;t improve things much. It&#8217;s possible that the book Oliver Twist is as poorly plotted as this movie, but I doubt it (I have more [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We accidentally started this movie at the half-way point (I hate DVDs that are poorly labeled) and didn&#8217;t even notice till it ended rather suddenly. Starting over from the start didn&#8217;t improve things much. It&#8217;s possible that the book Oliver Twist is as poorly plotted as this movie, but I doubt it (I have more faith in Dickens). </p>

<p>Why on earth are Fagin and Sikes so freaked out about Oliver leaving? Haven&#8217;t kids run away before? It appears that Oliver is a member of the gang for approximately 12 hours before he&#8217;s adopted. He hardly has time to meet Dodger before being sent off to bed and then sent off to get caught, let alone become so familiar with the gang as to represent a threat. Admittedly, the kid playing Oliver isn&#8217;t too bad, since all he has to do is stand there with a bemused look on his face as the events in the movie pass him by.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063385/">Oliver! @ IMDb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/06/oliver/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the Heat of the Night (1967)</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/05/heat-of-the-night</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/05/heat-of-the-night#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 12:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/05/in-the-heat-of-the-night-1967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>They call me Mr. Tibbs</p>

<p>One interesting side effect of watching old movies is getting to see classic lines in context. Some work (&#8221;I coulda been a contendah&#8220;) and some don&#8217;t. Well, this one works pretty well. I&#8217;m really growing to like Sidney Poitier, and I thought Rod Steiger did a pretty good job [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>They call me Mr. Tibbs</p>
</blockquote>

<p>One interesting side effect of watching old movies is getting to see classic lines in context. Some work (&#8221;<a href="http://zeppox.net/weblog/2004/11/on-the-waterfront">I coulda been a contendah</a>&#8220;) and some don&#8217;t. Well, this one works pretty well. I&#8217;m really growing to like Sidney Poitier, and I thought Rod Steiger did a pretty good job as well. I&#8217;m a little annoyed about the resolution to the murder though.</p>

<p><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0061811/">In the Heat of the Night @ IMDb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/05/heat-of-the-night/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Falling behind!</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/04/falling-behind</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/04/falling-behind#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 00:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackson.zeppox.net/weblog/2005/04/13/falling-behind</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow, we&#8217;re really falling behind on the Great Oscar Project. A Man for All Seasons has been sitting next to the DVD player for weeks.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, we&#8217;re really falling behind on the Great Oscar Project. <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0060665/">A Man for All Seasons</a> has been sitting next to the DVD player for weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/04/falling-behind/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sound of Music (1965)</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/the-sound-of-music</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/the-sound-of-music#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 02:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackson.zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/19/the-sound-of-music-1965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Sound of Music @ IMDb</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059742/">The Sound of Music @ IMDb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/the-sound-of-music/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sound of Music (1965)</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/erica-sound-of-music</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/erica-sound-of-music#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>erica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackson.zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/26/the-sound-of-music</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I love this movie.  I watched it about a thousand times when I was a kid, and I&#8217;m happy to say that watching it as an adult was equally enjoyable (unlike say, Ladybugs or the Mighty Ducks or other childhood favorites that appall you and make you wonder when in the world you got [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <em>love</em> this movie.  I watched it about a thousand times when I was a kid, and I&#8217;m happy to say that watching it as an adult was equally enjoyable (unlike say, Ladybugs or the Mighty Ducks or other childhood favorites that appall you and make you wonder when in the world you got good taste!).  Anyways, I&#8217;d only seen the TV-cut version, so it was really fun to see all the scenes that I had missed.  Plus, unlike virtually every other pre-the modern age (i.e. anytime before I was born) musical, the Sound of Music hardly even spikes the offensive to feminists radar!  As Jack pointed out, there is that one song where Liesl and Rolfe are singing, and he seems to think that the role of grown women is to be wooed by men, but really, that song isn&#8217;t even that bad.  There are a few other eyebrow raising lines, but for the most part, you just enjoy the fabulous singing and beautiful cinematography.</p>

<p>A note about the DVD, you can watch the movie with the commentary on, and what&#8217;s awesome about this is that he (the director) doesn&#8217;t talk through any of the songs and the voice track has been removed.  This means that with the subtitles on, you can do your own karaoke and you too can drive your spouse crazy!  Do, a deer a female deer, Re, a drop of golden sun&#8230;Sorry, Jack&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/erica-sound-of-music/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Fair Lady (1964)</title>
		<link>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/my-fair-lady</link>
		<comments>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/my-fair-lady#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TGOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackson.zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/16/my-fair-lady-1964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My Fair Lady @ IMDb</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0058385/">My Fair Lady @ IMDb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zeppox.net/weblog/2005/03/my-fair-lady/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
